	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/3	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/3	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/3	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/3	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/3	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	3/4	75.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/4	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/4	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	3/4	75.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/4	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/56	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	6/56	10.7%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/56	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/56	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/56	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/15	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/15	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/15	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/15	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/15	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	8/55	14.5%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	18/55	32.7%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	8/55	14.5%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	5/55	09.1%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/55	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/20	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	8/20	40.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/20	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/20	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/20	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	2/18	11.1%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	4/18	22.2%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	4/18	22.2%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/18	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/18	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	8/11	72.7%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	8/11	72.7%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	8/11	72.7%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	8/11	72.7%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/11	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	80/95	84.2%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	80/95	84.2%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	80/95	84.2%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/95	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/95	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/12	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/12	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/12	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/12	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/12	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	4/8	50.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/8	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/8	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	4/8	50.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/8	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/4	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/4	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/4	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/4	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/4	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	81/95	85.3%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	81/95	85.3%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	81/95	85.3%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/95	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	81/95	85.3%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	27/100	27.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	44/100	44.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	38/100	38.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	19/100	19.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/100	00.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/100	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	23/100	23.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/100	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/100	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/100	00.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	44/100	44.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	37/100	37.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	37/100	37.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	40/100	40.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/100	00.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	81/100	81.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	81/100	81.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	81/100	81.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/100	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	81/100	81.0%	59,044

Yolo County, California

County Details

Total Population

214,977

Quality

Reach

Secondhand Smoke (SHS)

SHS By Jurisdiction

Quality

25.6%

Reach

72.5%

Multi-Unit Housing (MUH)

MUH By Jurisdiction

Quality

4.6%

Reach

31.6%

Tobacco Retail Sales (SALES)

SALES By Jurisdiction

Quality

31.6%

Reach

72.5%

Flavored Tobacco (FLA)

FLA By Jurisdiction

Quality

64.8%

Reach

96.7%

IMPORTANT NOTE: Please use the Quality and Reach scores in the individual CX Indicators (below) for your CX process. These individual CX Indicator scores and charts show each jurisdiction's scores based on the sub-set of rubric questions that are currently being analyzed for the CX process. Please do not use the scores in the four major policy topics (above) for your CX process. The four topics above reflect policy scores based on grading policies against all rubric questions, including those that remain un-scored during Phase 1 of updating PETS, which means these scores are currently lower than the individual Indicators.

Quality

Reach

Indicator 1.1.2

Content Neutral Signage Restriction

Quality

0.0%

Reach

0.0%

Indicator 1.2.10

Minimum Retail Price/Package/Volume Size

Quality

30.0%