	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/3	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/3	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/3	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/3	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/3	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/4	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/4	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/4	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/4	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/4	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/56	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	6/56	10.7%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/56	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/56	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/56	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/15	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/15	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/15	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/15	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/15	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/55	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	40/55	72.7%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	24/55	43.6%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	11/55	20.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	23/55	41.8%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/20	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	20/20	100.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/20	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/20	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/20	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/18	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	16/18	88.9%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	16/18	88.9%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/18	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	10/18	55.6%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	11/11	100.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	11/11	100.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	11/11	100.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	9/11	81.8%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	11/11	100.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	80/95	84.2%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	80/95	84.2%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	80/95	84.2%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/95	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	80/95	84.2%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	2/12	16.7%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/12	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/12	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/12	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/12	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/8	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/8	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	2/8	25.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/8	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/8	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/4	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	NO	0/4	00.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/4	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/4	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/4	00.0%	59,044

	Jursdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	81/95	85.3%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	81/95	85.3%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	81/95	85.3%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/95	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	81/95	85.3%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/100	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	18/100	18.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	10/100	10.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	3/100	03.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	8/100	08.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	NO	0/100	00.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	6/100	06.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	NO	0/100	00.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/100	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	NO	0/100	00.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	11/100	11.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	9/100	09.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	9/100	09.0%	52,826
4	Winters	YES	9/100	09.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	9/100	09.0%	59,044

	Jurisdiction	Policy	Score	Quality	Population
1	Unincorporated	YES	81/100	81.0%	27,987
2	Davis	YES	81/100	81.0%	67,988
3	West Sacramento	YES	81/100	81.0%	52,826
4	Winters	NO	0/100	00.0%	7,132
5	Woodland	YES	81/100	81.0%	59,044

Yolo County, California

County Details

Total Population

214,977

Quality

Reach

Secondhand Smoke (SHS)

SHS By Jurisdiction

Quality

7.8%

Reach

87.0%

Multi-Unit Housing (MUH)

MUH By Jurisdiction

Quality

1.2%

Reach

31.6%

Tobacco Retail Sales (SALES)

SALES By Jurisdiction

Quality

9.4%

Reach

100.0%

Flavored Tobacco (FLA)

FLA By Jurisdiction

Quality

64.8%

Reach

96.7%

IMPORTANT NOTE: Please use the Quality and Reach scores in the individual CX Indicators (below) for your CX process. These individual CX Indicator scores and charts show each jurisdiction's scores based on the sub-set of rubric questions that are currently being analyzed for the CX process. Please do not use the scores in the four major policy topics (above) for your CX process. The four topics above reflect policy scores based on grading policies against all rubric questions, including those that remain un-scored during Phase 1 of updating PETS, which means these scores are currently lower than the individual Indicators.

Quality

Reach

Indicator 1.1.2

Content Neutral Signage Restriction

Quality

0.0%

Reach

0.0%

Indicator 1.2.10

Minimum Retail Price/Package/Volume Size

Quality

0.0%